Creature from the Black Lagoon
(Spoilers)
When I sat down to watch this movie, I
was expecting the most ridiculous, stupid and shlock-y movie I had
ever seen. My expectation was coloured by the way classic sci-fi is
remembered by satirists and film-nerds today. Big rubber suits,
anti-scientific rhetoric and the one dashingly handsome scientist who
saw it all coming but wasn't listened to. But when it ended and the
credits faded into view I was left pleasantly surprised. It was by no
means a piece of high-art, but was it also wasn't low-art. The suit
was big and rubber to be sure, but there was a great deal more to it
than just that.
When I sat down to watch this movie, I
was expecting the most ridiculous, stupid and shlock-y movie I had
ever seen. My expectation was coloured by the way classic sci-fi is
remembered by satirists and film-nerds today. Big rubber suits,
anti-scientific rhetoric and the one dashingly handsome scientist who
saw it all coming but wasn't listened to. But when it ended and the
credits faded into view I was left pleasantly surprised. It was by no
means a piece of high-art, but was it also wasn't low-art. The suit
was big and rubber to be sure, but there was a great deal more to it
than just that.
Creature from the Black Lagoon was
released in 1954 by Universal International and directed by one of
the masters of classic sci-fi Jack Arnold (a year after It
came from outer space and a year
before Tarantula. Jack
was a busy man). The film starts with an oddly grandiose display of
Douglas Trumbull-esqe effects as the planet earth is formed, whilst a
suitably noble sounding man quotes the book of Genesis and gives
a quite detailed account of evolution in the same speech. And that
sets the tone for the movie almost immediately. This movie,
unsurprisingly, loves science. It loves science more than even the
most dedicated of science teachers and it loves firing out facts
whenever it gets a chance. Want to the name of the process by which
geologist use to date rocks? Well it tells you. You know what a
Lungfish is? Well you're told within the first 15 minutes.
After the witnessing the birth of
humanity, we come to scene of an archeological dig along the banks of
the Amazon river, where the digging team suddenly come across a big
hand sticking out of a rock. Whilst they ponder over why there is a
giant webbed hand sticking out of a rock, a giant webbed hand appears
out of the river behind them whilst they aren't looking. The film
wastes no time in giving a glance of the creature and I love it for
that. After that necessary introduction to giant hands, we get our
first glimpse of the films other unique selling point of underwater
photography. While not a completely new field at the time, it was
still difficult. And it plays such an important role in the film that
the main character first scene starts with him underwater.
At this point, we are introduced to our
principal cast. In an interesting change for most films of its ilk,
where it's always one scientist in a group of borderline Luddites who
treat science like superstitious ramblings, the group are all
scientists. They go back to where the arm was found in the hopes of
finding the rest of it for both the advancement of science and
funding for their institute. A noble enough endeavour. It's just a
shame that when they get back to the dig site, the arm that is
attached to a monster has killed the rest of the dig team left at the
site. Whoops. So they keep digging, seemingly ignoring the two men
who died under what could only be called “Incredibly suspicious
circumstances”. Eventually, they decide to go down the river to the
“Black Lagoon”. And then, we get our first full body shot of the
creature.
“Gil-man” as he refereed to in
production notes, is a great monster for this movie. He is not a true
aggressor in story, he is more of an animal whose territory is being
invaded. He does, however, develop a fixation on Kay Lawrence, the
only woman in the movie, and spends the final 30-40 minutes of the
film trying to kidnap her and take her back to his grotto. This
brings him into conflict with the scientists, including Mark (who
desperately wants to harpoon the creature and parade the corpse
around, for science). The way he moves, both on land and underwater,
is unnerving. And when his gills rise and fall on land is brilliantly
creepy. The fact he can only stare unblinkingly only adds to his
image. Though I must be honest, the fact that he feels compelled to
to kidnap a woman who isn't even the same species as him is just
plain weird. But the film isn't a sci-fi disaster film like Tarantula
or The Monolith
Monsters. It's a small story
with an antagonist who isn't much more than an animal. Gil-man
attacking Kay is necessary to make the audience want to see the
protagonists hunt him down.
And
thats what makes it so compelling, and what makes it more than “man
in suit menacingly walks at the camera”. The scientists aren't all
infallible, Gil-man is an animal who is trying to live and defend his
territory. If he wasn't trying to kidnap a woman, the scientists
would come across as cold-blooded villains who either want to capture
him or kill him. And, when he is finally shot “dead” and sinks
into the water, there is no great sense of victory. Nor loss. It just
ends, in an oddly poignant way. And you're left with the thought
“What if they left him alone? Is he the last of his kind?” And
then you find out that Gil-man appeared in two sequels and it's all a
little bit ruined. But, as it stands, Creature from the
Black Lagoon is an excellent
piece of classic sci-fi from one of the original greats of the genre.


Comments
Post a Comment